open encyclopedia * Article Search: * *
*
*

Proto-Indo-European language

From open-encyclopedia.com - the free encyclopedia.

The Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) is the hypothetical common ancestor of the Indo-European languages.


Indo-European
Indo-European languages
Anatolian | Indo-Iranian | Greek | Italic
Celtic | Germanic | Armenian
Balto-Slavic | Tocharian | Albanian
Proto-Indo-European
Language | Society | Religion
Kurgan | Yamna | Aryan
Indo-European studies


As PIE is not directly attested, all PIE sounds and words are reconstructed using the comparative method. The standard convention is to mark unattested forms with an asterisk: *wódr̥ "water", *ḱwṓn "dog", *tréyes "three (masculine)", etc. Many of the words in the modern Indo-European languages are derived from such "protowords" via regular sound change (e.g., Grimm's law).

All Indo-European languages are inflected languages (although Modern English is much less inflected), and by comparative reconstruction it is highly assured that at least the latest stage of the common PIE mother languages (i.e. Late PIE) was an inflectional (and more suffixing than prefixing) language. However, by means of internal reconstruction and morphological (re-)analysis of the reconstructed, seemingly most archaic PIE word forms it has recently been shown to be very probable that at a more distant stage (then: Early) PIE may have been a root-inflectional language like e.g. Proto-Semitic. As a consequence, it seems to be highly probable that PIE once was of the root-and-pattern morphological type (literature: Pooth (2004): "Ablaut und autosegmentale Morphologie: Theorie der uridg. Wurzelflexion", in: Arbeitstagung "Indogermanistik, Germanistik, Linguistik" in Jena, Sept. 2002).

Other works have tried to show that the Caucasian languages, particularly the Northwest Caucasian family, spoken in Georgia and Turkey, may be the closest relatives to the Indo-European stock. While these are not widely-held theories, substantial evidence investigated by the linguist John Colarusso seems to support their theory. In particular, the one-vowel hypothesis which has been put forward for Indo-European would be borne out by the usage of substantial secondary articulation like that found in the Northwest Caucasian languages and, indeed, in the hypothesized PIE. Also, the Northwest Caucasian languages preserve a large number of guttural phonemes which may be the modern equivalents of PIE "laryngeals".

Contents

Phonology

Proto-Indo-European is conjectured to have used the following phonemes:

Consonants

Proto-Indo-European consonants
CONSONANTS labials coronals palatovelars velars labiovelars
voiceless stops p t k kw
voiced stops b d ǵ g gw
aspirated stops bh dh ǵh gh gwh
nasals m n      
fricatives   s h1, h2, h3
liquids, glides w r, l y    

The table gives the most common notation in modern publications. Variant transcriptions are given below. Raised h stands for aspiration. The existence of voiceless aspirate stops in the proto-language is (ph, th, ḱh, kh, kwh) is disputed. According to the glottalic theory, the "voiced unaspirated stops" of the system as described above were phonetically ejectives, and the "voiced aspirated stops" were phonetically unaspirated.

Labials

p, b, bh

Coronals/Dentals

t, d, dh

Tectals

Palatovelars

ḱ, ǵ, ǵh (also transcribed k', g', g'h or k̑, g̑, g̑h or k̂, ĝ, ĝh)

[k]- or [g]-like sounds which underwent a characteristic change in the Satem languages; they were possibly palatalized velars ([kj], [gj]) in Proto-Indo-European.

Velars

k, g, gh.

Labiovelars

kw, gw, gwh (also transcribed kv, gv, gvh or k, g, gu̯h)

Raised w stands for labialization, or lip-rounding accompanying the articulation of velar sounds ([kw] is a sound similar to English qu in queen).

Fricatives

s. The 'laryngeals' may have been fricatives, but there is no consensus as to their phonetic realization. There were also fricatives allophonic of t, s, usually transcribed þ, z.

Laryngeals

The symbols h1, h2 and h3 stand for three hypothetical "laryngeal" phonemes. In non-laryngealistic theories, the corresponding phoneme is sometimes called schwa indogermanicum and transcribed ə.

Nasals and Liquids

r, l, m, n, with vocalic allophones r̥, l̥, m̥, n̥.

Semivowels

w, y (also transcribed u̯, i̯) with vocalic allophones u, i.

Vowels

  • Short vowels a, e, o
  • Long vowels ā, ē, ō; a colon (:) is sometimes employed to indicate vowel length instead of the macron sign (a:, e:, o:).
  • Diphthongs ei, eu, ēi, ēu, oi, ou, ōi, ōu
  • vocalic allophones of consonantal phonemes: u, i, r̥, l̥, m̥, n̥.

Other long vowels may have appeared already in the proto-language by compensatory lengthening: ī, ū, r̥̄, l̥̄, m̥̄, n̥̄.

Ablaut

Indo-European had a characteristic general ablaut sequence that contrasted the vowel phonemes o/e/ə/Ø through the same root.

Noun

Pronoun

Verb

External Links

bg:Индоевропейски праезик pl:JÄ™zyk praindoeuropejski

Contribute Found an omission? You can freely contribute to this Wikipedia article. Edit Article
Copyright © 2003-2004 Zeeshan Muhammad. All rights reserved. Legal notices. Part of the New Frontier Information Network.